Students for Voting Rights

Tackling local threats to democracy during a new era of voter suppression!

Local Voting Rights Work

CDCs are coalitions, which is a form of infrastructure. This means that they’re not always directly facilitating initiatives but providing a platform to bring together partners for campus initiatives.

How We're Protecting Voting Rights Locally

Students for Voting Rights (SVR) was originally an Arizona-based initiative that the Task Force has since adopted. SVR will ensure that students on college campuses have the easiest access to their right to vote. Current SVR operations include: protecting ballot-box accessibility on campus, ensuring students are informed on how to vote and where to vote, how to register for early voting, canvassing classrooms, and helping campus organizations register students to vote.

ASVR is transitioning to targeting voter suppression measures, supporting local ballot initiatives to expand voting rights, and advocating for better ballot access for students.

Protecting Voting Accessibility With Local Election Officials

The Office includes senior leadership coordinating Divisions and strategizing Initiatives. It houses advisory bodies, like the Academic Advisory Board, which guide policy stances and democratic reforms to strengthen institutional faith.

Raising Awareness About Voter Suppression Attempts

Researching and addressing issues like voter suppression and gerrymandering, crafting nonpartisan, evidence-based proposals for democratic engagement and advocating for policy reforms to local, state, and federal officials.

Organizing for Local and State Voting Rights Protections

Planning and executing events, such as nonpartisan town halls, educational assemblies, and public programming. The Organizing Division crafts materials to educate the public on democracy, civic engagement, and the dangers of authoritarianism, while advocating for disenfranchised communities and collaborating with the Advocacy Division on solutions.

How We're Protecting Voting Rights Locally

Necessity and Urgency: What Project 2025 Could Look Like on College Campuses and How Pro-Democracy Groups Have Resisted It

Governor Ron DeSantis’ administration in Florida has implemented policies that have significantly impacted civic engagement and academic freedom on university campuses. For example, the removal of polling locations from college campuses, justified by concerns over safety and accessibility, has made it more difficult for students to vote,  especially those reliant on-campus facilities due to transportation barriers. Stricter voter ID laws have further compounded these challenges, particularly affecting out-of-state students who may not have the required Florida-issued identification. 

Alongside these voting restrictions, DeSantis’ administration has supported book bans and limitations on teaching about race, gender, and other social issues, effectively stifling academic freedom and open discussion on important civic and social topics. The “Stop WOKE Act”, for instance, restricts how professors can discuss these topics, framing classroom speech as government speech, which the state can control. This law has led to professors being threatened with disciplinary action for discussing certain topics in ways the state deems unacceptable.

In response to these challenges, pro-democracy student groups across Florida universities have taken active measures to protect voting rights and civic engagement on campus. At Florida State University, the student government passed a resolution condemning these voter suppression tactics and collaborated with local voting rights organizations to provide students with information on how to navigate the new voting laws. Similarly, student leaders at the University of Southern Florida have formed coalitions that include representatives from various student organizations, faculty, and lofcal community groups. These coalitions focus on voter registration drives, organizing education workshops on civic engagement, and coordinating actions to protect voting rights. 

However, the implementation of Senate Bill 7050 has severely hampered these efforts. This bill, which increases penalties for errors made during voter registration, has led many student groups to cease their voter registration drives due to the risks involved. At the University of South Florida, for instance, most college clubs have stopped registering voters because they fear the penalties. Despite these setbacks, some organizations like People Power for Florida continue their voter registration efforts on campuses, though the process has become more complicated and cautious​.

In addition to these efforts, pro-democracy student groups have responded to restrictions on academic freedom by launching awareness campaigns, supporting legal challenges, and organizing alternative educational forums. For instance, during Banned Books Week, FSU students and alumni participated in panel discussions to raise awareness about the impact of book bans on Florida’s education system. These events, like the one held at Midtown Reader, emphasized the importance of protecting access to diverse literary perspectives and fostering critical discussions on censorship and free expression​​.

For all the above reasons, the democracy movement needs sustainable campus coalitions to protect against attacks on democracy and voting rights. The Florida example serves as a preview for what college campuses could look like under Project 2025 (minus the complete military police state aspect). Therefore, to end the suppression of civic engagement and raise awareness about threats like Project 2025, creating long-lasting campus infrastructure is critical in 2024—no matter who wins the White House.